[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1cffa53-5583-be62-133f-90d29d607ebf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:05:55 -0400
From: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com,
sassmann@...hat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, jlelli@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
mike.marciniszyn@...el.com, dennis.dalessandro@...el.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, jerinj@...vell.com,
mathias.nyman@...el.com, jiri@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch v1 2/3] i40e: limit msix vectors based on
housekeeping CPUs
On 9/22/20 4:44 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:34:02AM -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote:
>> On 9/22/20 5:54 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> But I don't also want to push toward a complicated solution to handle CPU hotplug
>>> if there is no actual problem to solve there.
>> Sure, even I am not particularly sure about the hotplug scenarios.
> Surely when isolation is something that will be configurable through
> cpuset, it will become interesting. For now it's probably not worth
> adding hundreds lines of code if nobody steps into such issue yet.
>
> What is probably more worthy for now is some piece of code to consolidate
> the allocation of those MSI vectors on top of the number of housekeeping
> CPUs.
+1
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Thanks
Nitesh
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists