[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200922214326.GF5217@lenoir>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 23:43:26 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/12] rcu: Implement rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded()
config dependent
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:27:32PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:43:40PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > This simplify the usage of this API and avoid checking the kernel
> > config from the callers.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
> > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
>
> Nice cleanup! I clearly should have done it this way to start with.
>
> Any reason I shouldn't pull this into -rcu right now?
I think that very one can be applied indeed.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists