lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:37:52 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2

Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch,
are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10?

I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to
5.11 then.

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not
> be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic
> branch.
> 
> The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though.  Arnd, can you
> re-review the updated patches?
---end quoted text---

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ