linux-kernel - Re: remove set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200922043752.GA29151@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:37:52 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2

Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch,
are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10?

I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to
5.11 then.

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not
> be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic
> branch.
> 
> The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though.  Arnd, can you
> re-review the updated patches?
---end quoted text---