[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14eb0558c8ff820280bb7354cfe33326@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:21:41 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PM / Domains: Add GENPD_FLAG_NO_SUSPEND/RESUME
flags
On 2020-09-22 01:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2020-09-21 09:18:17)
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:49 PM Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Add GENPD_FLAG_NO_SUSPEND/RESUME flags to instruct genpd to keep the
>> > status of the PM domain unaltered during suspend/resume respectively.
>> > The flags are aimed at power domains coupled to co-processors which
>> > enter low-power modes independent to that of the application processor.
>> >
>> > Specifically the flags are to be used by the power domains exposed
>> > by the AOSS QMP driver linked to modem, adsp, cdsp remoteprocs. These
>> > power domains are used to notify the Always on Subsystem (AOSS) that
>> > a particular co-processor is up. AOSS uses this information to wait
>> > for the co-processors to suspend before starting its sleep sequence.
>> > The application processor powers off these power domains only if the
>> > co-processor has crashed or powered off and remains unaltered during
>> > system suspend/resume.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Applied with the Ulf's R-by along with the [2/2] as 5.10 material,
>> thanks!
>>
>
> There was a bunch of discussion on this patch series and I thought the
> consensus was to not apply these patches and instead implement a custom
> qcom specific API that does this instead.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200913034603.GV3715@yoga/
The power domains which were targeted
to use the flags will be replaced by
custom qcom specific API. So let's not
pick up the patch series.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists