| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2009212229270.6434@eggly.anvils>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
tj@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, willy@...radead.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, lkp@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
richard.weiyang@...il.com, kirill@...temov.name,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, rong.a.chen@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com,
vdavydov.dev@...il.com, shy828301@...il.com,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 21/32] mm/lru: introduce the relock_page_lruvec
function
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, Alex Shi wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Use this new function to replace repeated same code, no func change.
>
> When testing for relock we can avoid the need for RCU locking if we simply
> compare the page pgdat and memcg pointers versus those that the lruvec is
> holding. By doing this we can avoid the extra pointer walks and accesses of
> the memory cgroup.
>
> In addition we can avoid the checks entirely if lruvec is currently NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Again, I'll wait to see __munlock_pagevec() fixed before Acking this
one, but that's the only issue. And I've suggested that you use
lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock() in mm/vmscan.c move_pages_to_lru(),
to replace the uglier and less efficient VM_BUG_ON_PAGE there.
Oh, there is one other issue: 0day robot did report (2020-06-19)
that sparse doesn't understand relock_page_lruvec*(): I've never
got around to working out how to write what it needs, conditional
__release plus __acquire in some form, I imagine. I've never got
into sparse annotations before, I'll give it a try, but if anyone
beats me that will be welcome: and there are higher priorities -
I do not think you should wait for the sparse warning to be fixed
before reposting.
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/mlock.c | 9 +-------
> mm/swap.c | 33 +++++++----------------------
> mm/vmscan.c | 8 +------
> 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 7b170e9028b5..ee6ef2d8ad52 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -488,6 +488,22 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_lruvec(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>
> struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *, struct pglist_data *);
>
> +static inline bool lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(struct page *page,
> + struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> + pg_data_t *pgdat = page_pgdat(page);
> + const struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz;
> +
> + if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> + return lruvec == &pgdat->__lruvec;
> +
> + mz = container_of(lruvec, struct mem_cgroup_per_node, lruvec);
> + memcg = page->mem_cgroup ? : root_mem_cgroup;
> +
> + return lruvec->pgdat == pgdat && mz->memcg == memcg;
> +}
> +
> struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p);
>
> struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
> @@ -1023,6 +1039,14 @@ static inline struct lruvec *mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(struct page *page,
> return &pgdat->__lruvec;
> }
>
> +static inline bool lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(struct page *page,
> + struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> + pg_data_t *pgdat = page_pgdat(page);
> +
> + return lruvec == &pgdat->__lruvec;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> return NULL;
> @@ -1469,6 +1493,34 @@ static inline void unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(struct lruvec *lruvec,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lruvec->lru_lock, flags);
> }
>
> +/* Don't lock again iff page's lruvec locked */
> +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irq(struct page *page,
> + struct lruvec *locked_lruvec)
> +{
> + if (locked_lruvec) {
> + if (lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(page, locked_lruvec))
> + return locked_lruvec;
> +
> + unlock_page_lruvec_irq(locked_lruvec);
> + }
> +
> + return lock_page_lruvec_irq(page);
> +}
> +
> +/* Don't lock again iff page's lruvec locked */
> +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(struct page *page,
> + struct lruvec *locked_lruvec, unsigned long *flags)
> +{
> + if (locked_lruvec) {
> + if (lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(page, locked_lruvec))
> + return locked_lruvec;
> +
> + unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(locked_lruvec, *flags);
> + }
> +
> + return lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, flags);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
>
> struct wb_domain *mem_cgroup_wb_domain(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
> diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c
> index 177d2588e863..0448409184e3 100644
> --- a/mm/mlock.c
> +++ b/mm/mlock.c
> @@ -302,17 +302,10 @@ static void __munlock_pagevec(struct pagevec *pvec, struct zone *zone)
> /* Phase 1: page isolation */
> for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> - struct lruvec *new_lruvec;
>
> /* block memcg change in mem_cgroup_move_account */
> lock_page_memcg(page);
> - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page));
> - if (new_lruvec != lruvec) {
> - if (lruvec)
> - unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
> - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page);
> - }
> -
> + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irq(page, lruvec);
> if (TestClearPageMlocked(page)) {
> /*
> * We already have pin from follow_page_mask()
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index b67959b701c0..2ac78e8fab71 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -209,19 +209,12 @@ static void pagevec_lru_move_fn(struct pagevec *pvec,
>
> for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
> struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> - struct lruvec *new_lruvec;
>
> /* block memcg migration during page moving between lru */
> if (!TestClearPageLRU(page))
> continue;
>
> - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page));
> - if (lruvec != new_lruvec) {
> - if (lruvec)
> - unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
> - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, &flags);
> - }
> -
> + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, lruvec, &flags);
> (*move_fn)(page, lruvec);
>
> SetPageLRU(page);
> @@ -865,17 +858,12 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr)
> }
>
> if (PageLRU(page)) {
> - struct lruvec *new_lruvec;
> -
> - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page,
> - page_pgdat(page));
> - if (new_lruvec != lruvec) {
> - if (lruvec)
> - unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec,
> - flags);
> + struct lruvec *prev_lruvec = lruvec;
> +
> + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, lruvec,
> + &flags);
> + if (prev_lruvec != lruvec)
> lock_batch = 0;
> - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, &flags);
> - }
>
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page);
> __ClearPageLRU(page);
> @@ -982,15 +970,8 @@ void __pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec)
>
> for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(pvec); i++) {
> struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> - struct lruvec *new_lruvec;
> -
> - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page));
> - if (lruvec != new_lruvec) {
> - if (lruvec)
> - unlock_page_lruvec_irqrestore(lruvec, flags);
> - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, &flags);
> - }
>
> + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, lruvec, &flags);
> __pagevec_lru_add_fn(page, lruvec);
> }
> if (lruvec)
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 789444ae4c88..2c94790d4cb1 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4280,15 +4280,9 @@ void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct pagevec *pvec)
>
> for (i = 0; i < pvec->nr; i++) {
> struct page *page = pvec->pages[i];
> - struct lruvec *new_lruvec;
>
> pgscanned++;
> - new_lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, page_pgdat(page));
> - if (lruvec != new_lruvec) {
> - if (lruvec)
> - unlock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
> - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page);
> - }
> + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irq(page, lruvec);
>
> if (!PageLRU(page) || !PageUnevictable(page))
> continue;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists