[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200922064058.GE25109@dragon>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:40:59 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-gw5xxx: correct interrupt flags
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:54:46PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> have the same meaning:
> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
>
> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Applied all, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists