linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] atomisp: Fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21f18dc2-a1bc-0a37-0336-fc35170a40e9@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:16:13 +0100
From:   Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] atomisp: Fixes and cleanups

On 22/09/2020 09:11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:53:49 +0100
> Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Mauro,
>>
>> Over the last month I've sent a few scattered patches to fix various
>> warnings from static analysers, but they seem to have fallen through the
>> cracks? I'm reposting them here as a series to make them easier to
>> review. If you do have any feedback that'd be great :)
> Usually, there's no need to re-send the patches, as we pick them
> from a patchwork queue.
>
> However, only one of the patches actually applied against the
> linux-media tree.
>
> So, please rebased the remaining patches on the top of it.
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
That's weird. They applied cleanly against yesterday's linux-next for 
me... I'll rebase on linux-media and resend.

Best,
Alex