linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] sched/cpupri: Remove pri_to_cpu[CPUPRI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200922083934.19275-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:39:33 +0200
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched/cpupri: Remove pri_to_cpu[CPUPRI_IDLE]

pri_to_cpu[CPUPRI_IDLE=0] isn't used since cpupri_set(..., newpri) is
never called with newpri = MAX_PRIO (140).

Current mapping:

p->rt_priority   p->prio   newpri   cpupri

                               -1       -1 (CPUPRI_INVALID)

                              140        0 (CPUPRI_IDLE)

                              100        1 (CPUPRI_NORMAL)

             1        98       98        3
           ...
            49        50       50       51
            50        49       49       52
           ...
            99         0        0      101

Even when cpupri was introduced with commit 6e0534f27819 ("sched: use a
2-d bitmap for searching lowest-pri CPU") in v2.6.27, only

   (1) CPUPRI_INVALID (-1),
   (2) MAX_RT_PRIO (100),
   (3) an RT prio (RT1..RT99)

were used as newprio in cpupri_set(..., newpri) -> convert_prio(newpri).

MAX_RT_PRIO is used only in dec_rt_tasks() -> dec_rt_prio() ->
dec_rt_prio_smp() -> cpupri_set() in case of !rt_rq->rt_nr_running.
I.e. it stands for a non-rt task, including the IDLE task.

Commit 57785df5ac53 ("sched: Fix task priority bug") removed code in
v2.6.33 which did set the priority of the IDLE task to MAX_PRIO.
Although this happened after the introduction of cpupri, it didn't have
an effect on the values used for cpupri_set(..., newpri).

Remove CPUPRI_IDLE and adapt the cpupri implementation accordingly.
This will save a useless for loop with an atomic_read in
cpupri_find_fitness() calling __cpupri_find().

New mapping:

p->rt_priority   p->prio   newpri   cpupri

                               -1       -1 (CPUPRI_INVALID)

                              100        0 (CPUPRI_NORMAL)

             1        98       98        2
           ...
            49        50       50       50
            50        49       49       51
           ...
            99         0        0      100

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
---
 kernel/sched/cpupri.c | 10 ++++------
 kernel/sched/cpupri.h |  7 +++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
index 0033731a0797..a5d14ed485f4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
  *  This code tracks the priority of each CPU so that global migration
  *  decisions are easy to calculate.  Each CPU can be in a state as follows:
  *
- *                 (INVALID), IDLE, NORMAL, RT1, ... RT99
+ *                 (INVALID), NORMAL, RT1, ... RT99
  *
  *  going from the lowest priority to the highest.  CPUs in the INVALID state
  *  are not eligible for routing.  The system maintains this state with
@@ -19,24 +19,22 @@
  *  in that class).  Therefore a typical application without affinity
  *  restrictions can find a suitable CPU with O(1) complexity (e.g. two bit
  *  searches).  For tasks with affinity restrictions, the algorithm has a
- *  worst case complexity of O(min(102, nr_domcpus)), though the scenario that
+ *  worst case complexity of O(min(101, nr_domcpus)), though the scenario that
  *  yields the worst case search is fairly contrived.
  */
 #include "sched.h"
 
-/* Convert between a 140 based task->prio, and our 102 based cpupri */
+/* Convert between a 140 based task->prio, and our 101 based cpupri */
 static int convert_prio(int prio)
 {
 	int cpupri;
 
 	if (prio == CPUPRI_INVALID)
 		cpupri = CPUPRI_INVALID;
-	else if (prio == MAX_PRIO)
-		cpupri = CPUPRI_IDLE;
 	else if (prio >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
 		cpupri = CPUPRI_NORMAL;
 	else
-		cpupri = MAX_RT_PRIO - prio + 1;
+		cpupri = MAX_RT_PRIO - prio;
 
 	return cpupri;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
index efbb492bb94c..1a162369b8d4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.h
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
 
-#define CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES	(MAX_RT_PRIO + 2)
+#define CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES	(MAX_RT_PRIO + 1)
 
 #define CPUPRI_INVALID		-1
-#define CPUPRI_IDLE		 0
-#define CPUPRI_NORMAL		 1
-/* values 2-101 are RT priorities 0-99 */
+#define CPUPRI_NORMAL		 0
+/* values 2-100 are RT priorities 0-99 */
 
 struct cpupri_vec {
 	atomic_t		count;
-- 
2.17.1