linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/6] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c8bde158-50f6-1656-4a7d-6323573ba501@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 08:24:11 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/6] Convert the intel iommu driver to the
 dma-iommu api

Hi Logan,

On 9/21/20 11:48 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2020-09-20 12:36 a.m., Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Logan,
>>
>> On 2020/9/19 4:47, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> Hi Lu,
>>>
>>> On 2020-09-11 9:21 p.m., Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> Tom Murphy has almost done all the work. His latest patch series was
>>>> posted here.
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200903201839.7327-1-murphyt7@tcd.ie/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>
>>>> This series is a follow-up with below changes:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Add a quirk for the i915 driver issue described in Tom's cover
>>>> letter.
>>>> 2. Fix several bugs in patch "iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use
>>>> bounce buffers" to make the bounce buffer work for untrusted devices.
>>>> 3. Several cleanups in iommu/vt-d driver after the conversion.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm trying to test this on an old Sandy Bridge, but found that I get
>>> spammed with warnings on boot. I've put a sample of a few of them below.
>>> They all seem to be related to ioat.
>>>
>>> I had the same issue with Tom's v2 but never saw this on his v1.
>>
>> Have you verified whether this could be reproduced with the lasted
>> upstream kernel (without this patch series)?
> 
> Yes.

I am sorry. Just want to make sure I understand you correctly. :-) When
you say "yes", do you mean you could reproduce this with pure upstream
kernel (5.9-rc6)?

> Also, it's hitting a warning in the dma-iommu code which would not
> be hit without this patch set.

Without this series, DMA APIs don't go through dma-iommu. Do you mind
posting the warning message?

Best regards,
baolu