linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Fix kernel-doc warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:24:18 +0200
From:   Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@...inx.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        michal.simek@...inx.com, sgoud@...inx.com, nagasure@...inx.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Fix kernel-doc warnings

Hi Mark,

On 17. 09. 20 19:28, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 09:27:06AM -0600, Amit Kumar Mahapatra wrote:
>> Fix kernel-doc warnings in ZynqMP qspi driver file.
> 
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.

I have tried to apply these 3 patches to your branches at
 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git

for-next/for-linus/for-5.10 and I can't see any issue with applying
these patches.
Can you please let us know if what tree/branch should be used?

Thanks,
Michal