[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de191c4d-cfe3-1414-53b8-e7a09cc15e32@de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:15:17 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mst@...hat.com
Cc: pasic@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
cohuck@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au, linuxram@...ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/2] s390: virtio: let arch validate VIRTIO features
Michael,
are you going to pick this series?
On 10.09.20 10:53, Pierre Morel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture
> to validate VIRTIO device features.
>
> I changed VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM to VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
> I forgot in drivers/virtio/Kconfig, and put back the inclusion
> of virtio_config.h for the definition of the callback in
> arch/s390/mm/init.c I wrongly removed in the last series.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
>
> Pierre Morel (2):
> virtio: let arch advertise guest's memory access restrictions
> s390: virtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
> drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists