[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22b12b8a-4c16-5377-043d-00750597f822@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:50:12 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jim Quinlan <jquinlan@...adcom.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: brcmstb: fix a missing if statement on a return
error check
On 22/09/2020 13:43, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:49 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>>
>>> The error return ret is not being check with an if statement and
>>
>> Wording alternative:
>> The return value from a call of the function “brcm_phy_start” was not checked and
>>
>>
>>> V2: disable clock as noted by Florian Fainelli and suggested by
>>> Jim Quinlan.
>>
>> Alex Dewar contributed another update suggestion.
>>
>> [PATCH v2] PCI: brcmstb: Add missing if statement and error path
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200921211623.33908-1-alex.dewar90@gmail.com/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1309860/
>>
>> The exception handling needs further development considerations
>> for this function implementation.
> Hello,
>
> I agree with Alex's patch. I should have suggested this at the
> beginning but as our upstream STB suspend/resume is not yet functional
> and the one-line change would have worked until we fixed
> suspend/resume.. But this is the proper modification.
Yup, go with Alex's patch. That one is correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>> Regards,
>> Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists