linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH REBASE 0/3] atomisp: Rebased fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:51:28 +0100
From:   Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Alex Dewar <alex.dewar90@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASE 0/3] atomisp: Rebased fixes

[snip]
> > That sounds more sensible. I've also just noticed that I introduced a bug in
> > the first patch when rebasing it :-/, so let's hold off on the whole series
> > and I'll do a proper tidy and resend after the next merge window.
> 
> Is the bug the memory leak if lm3554_platform_data_func() fails?
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

>  
Nope. I put a "return ret" for the last check instead of "goto err_del_timer"...

The version of this code in linux-next does the correct "if (PTR_ERR(...))"
check after calling lm3554_platform_data_func(), but this patch doesn't
seem to have made its way into linux-media yet. All the more reason to
resend my patches after the merge window, I suppose.

Best,
Alex