[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200922150255.5850-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:02:55 +0200
From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
CC: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<aliguori@...zon.com>, <amit@...nel.org>, <mheyne@...zon.de>,
<pdurrant@...zon.co.uk>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] xen-blkfront: Apply changed parameter name to the document
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:44:25 +0200 "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@...rix.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 04:27:39PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > On 22.09.20 16:15, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> > >
> > > Commit 14e710fe7897 ("xen-blkfront: rename indirect descriptor
> > > parameter") changed the name of the module parameter for the maximum
> > > amount of segments in indirect requests but missed updating the
> > > document. This commit updates the document.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>
> Does this need to be backported to stable branches?
I don't think so, as this is not a bug affecting users?
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
Powered by blists - more mailing lists