linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/xen: open code alloc_vm_area in arch_gnttab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a3daaf31-d1cd-2bf1-5b2f-aaae32baa7f6@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:34:35 -0400
From:   boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/xen: open code alloc_vm_area in
 arch_gnttab_valloc


On 9/22/20 11:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:24:20AM -0400, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com wrote:
>> On 9/22/20 10:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:44:10PM -0400, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com wrote:
>>>> This will end up incrementing area->ptes pointer. So perhaps something like
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> pte_t **ptes = area->ptes;
>>>>
>>>> if (apply_to_page_range(&init_mm, (unsigned long)area->area->addr,
>>>>                         PAGE_SIZE * nr_frames, gnttab_apply, &ptes)) {
>>>>
>>>>        ...
>>> Yeah.  What do you think of this version? 
>>
>> Oh yes, this is way better. This now can actually be read without trying to mentally unwind triple pointers. (You probably want to initialize idx to zero before calling apply_to_page_range(), I am not sure it's guaranteed to be zero).
> Both instances are static variables, thus in .bss and initialized.
> So unless you insist I don't think we need a manual one.


Yes, you are right. (I thought perhaps this code could be called more than once but no, it can't).


-boris