[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200922153816.5883-2-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:44:12 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH printk 1/5] printk: get new seq before enabling interrupts
After copying all records to the dynamic ringbuffer, setup_log_buf()
checks to see if any records were dropped during the switch. However,
it needs to check before enabling interrupts since new records could
arrive in an interrupt, thus causing setup_log_buf() to erroneously
think that it had dropped messages.
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 1fe3d0cb2fe0..00bc1fce3299 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -1181,12 +1181,12 @@ void __init setup_log_buf(int early)
*/
prb = &printk_rb_dynamic;
+ seq = prb_next_seq(&printk_rb_static) - seq;
+
logbuf_unlock_irqrestore(flags);
- if (seq != prb_next_seq(&printk_rb_static)) {
- pr_err("dropped %llu messages\n",
- prb_next_seq(&printk_rb_static) - seq);
- }
+ if (seq)
+ pr_err("dropped %llu messages\n", seq);
pr_info("log_buf_len: %u bytes\n", log_buf_len);
pr_info("early log buf free: %u(%u%%)\n",
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists