[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pn6cdtwa.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:18:53 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Changki Kim <changki.kim@...sung.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] printk: Store all three timestamps
On 2020-09-23, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> printk() historically shows the timestamps from the monotonic clock.
printk() uses the local clock, not the monotonic clock.
> It is fast, available early during boot, in any context, and even
> without using any lock.
>
> There are repeated requests [1][2][3] to show the timestamps from other
> clocks. The main motivation is to make it easier to correlate the kernel
> and userspace logs. Where userspace logs usually use the real time
> clock.
>
> Unfortunately, it is not possible to simply replace the default clock.
> Userspace tools, like journalctl, dmesg, expect to get the timestamps
> from the mono via /dev/kmsg interface or syslog syscall [4].
> Also administrators would be confused when logs from different
> systems use different clocks depending on kernel version or
> build option [5].
>
> As a result, the mono clock has to stay as the default clock
> and has to be used in the current user interfaces.
Actually this series is changing the default clock from local to
monotonic. I for one welcome this change (and wish ftrace would do it as
well), but it is a change.
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 1560649cbd35..0ed8901916f4 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -520,10 +522,10 @@ static int log_store(u32 caller_id, int facility, int level,
> r.info->facility = facility;
> r.info->level = level & 7;
> r.info->flags = flags & 0x1f;
> - if (ts_nsec > 0)
> - r.info->ts_nsec = ts_nsec;
> + if (ts)
> + r.info->ts = *ts;
> else
> - r.info->ts_nsec = local_clock();
> + ktime_get_fast_timestamps(&r.info->ts);
I am wondering if we still want to keep the local_clock() as well (and
as the default). ftrace also uses it by default, which means traces and
printk logs could be coordinated by default until now.
The two clocks can vary quite a bit. I have a laptop where the local
clock drifts away from monotonic at about 50us per second.
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
> index 0adaa685d1ca..09082c8472d3 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -14,7 +15,7 @@
> */
> struct printk_info {
> u64 seq; /* sequence number */
> - u64 ts_nsec; /* timestamp in nanoseconds */
> + struct ktime_timestamps ts; /* timestamps */
> u16 text_len; /* length of text message */
> u8 facility; /* syslog facility */
> u8 flags:5; /* internal record flags */
If we wanted to keep the local clock, should the local clock be a part
of struct ktime_timestamps? Or should struct printk_info maintain that
separately (either as @ts_nsec or @ts_local or whatever).
John Ogness
Powered by blists - more mailing lists