[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200923045231.GH3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 05:52:31 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] csky: Fix a size determination in gpr_get()
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:37:31AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > What's going on there? The mapping is really weird - assuming
> > you had v0..v31 in the first 32 elements of regs->vr[], you
> > end up with
> >
> > v0 v1 v2 v3 v2 v3 v6 v7 v4 v5 v10 v11 v6 v7 v14 v15
> > v8 v9 v18 v19 v10 v11 v22 v23 v12 v13 v26 v27 v14 v15 v30 v31
> >
> > in the beginning of the output. Assuming it is the intended
> > behaviour, it's probably worth some comments...
> FPU & VDSP use the same regs. 32 FPU regs' width is 64b and 16 VDSP
> regs' width is 128b.
>
> vr[0], vr[1] = fp[0] & vr[0] vr[1], vr[2], vr[3] = vdsp reg[0]
> ...
> vr[60], vr[61] = fp[15] & vr[60] vr[61], vr[62], vr[63] = vdsp reg[15]
> vr[64], vr[65] = fp[16]
> vr[66], vr[67] = fp[17]
> ...
> vr[94], vr[95] = fp[31]
>
> Yeah, this is confusing and I'll add a comment later.
Umm... It would help if you described these 3 layouts:
1) kernel-side with VDSP
2) userland (identical to (1)?)
3) kernel-side without VDSP
Still confused...
PS: my apologies re commit message - I left a note to myself when doing
that series and then forgot about it ;-/
Anyway, which tree should it go through? In any case, that fix is
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
and I can take it through vfs.git or you guys can pick in csky tree;
up to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists