lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 05:07:54 +0000 From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com> To: <Eugen.Hristev@...rochip.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com> CC: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: at_xdmac: separate register defines into header file Hi, Eugen, On 9/14/20 5:09 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Separate register defines into header file. > This is required to support a slightly different version of the register > map in new hardware versions of the XDMAC. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com> > --- > drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 143 +-------------------------------- > drivers/dma/at_xdmac_regs.h | 154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/dma/at_xdmac_regs.h Even with the sama7g5 support there is a single .c file that includes the .h. I wouldn't split the registers definitions in a dedicated file. Cheers, ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists