linux-kernel - [PATCH -next v2] powerpc/perf: Fix symbol undeclared warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200923071453.2540-1-wangwensheng4@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:14:53 +0000
From:   Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@...wei.com>
To:     <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        <paulus@...ba.org>, <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, <wangwensheng4@...wei.com>,
        <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v2] powerpc/perf: Fix symbol undeclared warning

Build kernel with `C=2`:
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:24:18: warning: symbol
'isa207_pmu_format_attr' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:101:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd21_bl_ev'
was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:115:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd22_bl_ev'
was not declared. Should it be static?

Those symbols are used only in the files that define them so we declare
them as static to fix the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@...wei.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 2 +-
 arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c    | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 964437adec18..85dc860b265b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_stop,	"config:32-35");
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_start,	"config:36-39");
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_cmp,	"config:40-49");
 
-struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
+static struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
 	&format_attr_event.attr,
 	&format_attr_pmcxsel.attr,
 	&format_attr_mark.attr,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 2a57e93a79dc..4a315fad1f99 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
 /* PowerISA v2.07 format attribute structure*/
 extern struct attribute_group isa207_pmu_format_group;
 
-int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
+static int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
 	PM_MRK_ST_DONE_L2,
 	PM_RADIX_PWC_L1_HIT,
 	PM_FLOP_CMPL,
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
 	PM_DISP_HELD_SYNC_HOLD,
 };
 
-int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
+static int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
 	PM_DTLB_MISS_16G,
 	PM_DERAT_MISS_2M,
 	PM_DTLB_MISS_2M,
-- 
2.25.0