[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <439c4b59-b1e6-88bb-568e-1c2a0feceed4@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:05:26 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...lessm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: skip probed failed device
On 2020-09-23 07:59, Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
> The cdn-dp sub driver probes the device failed on PINEBOOK Pro.
>
> kernel: cdn-dp fec00000.dp: [drm:cdn_dp_probe [rockchipdrm]] *ERROR* missing extcon or phy
> kernel: cdn-dp: probe of fec00000.dp failed with error -22
Wouldn't it make more sense to simply not enable the DisplayPort node in
the upstream DT, until the type-C phy work has been done to make it
usable at all? AIUI the "official" Manjaro kernel is carrying a bunch of
hacks to make type-C work via extcon, but they know that isn't an
upstreamable solution.
Robin.
> Then, the device halts all of the DRM related device jobs. For example,
> the operations: vop_component_ops, vop_component_ops and
> rockchip_dp_component_ops cannot be bound to corresponding devices. So,
> Xorg cannot find the correct DRM device.
>
> This patch skips the probing failed devices to fix this issue.
>
> Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/2020-September/022352.html
> Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@...lessos.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> index 0f3eb392fe39..de13588602b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,12 @@ static struct component_match *rockchip_drm_match_add(struct device *dev)
>
> if (!d)
> break;
> + if (!d->driver) {
> + DRM_DEV_ERROR(d,
> + "%s did not probe successfully",
> + drv->driver.name);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> device_link_add(dev, d, DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
> component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_dev, d);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists