lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c38406b7-f1d1-35d8-8015-bacce7a52226@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 23 Sep 2020 08:43:11 -0700
From:   Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     vkoul@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, jing.lin@...el.com,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] x86/asm: move the raw asm in iosubmit_cmds512() to
 special_insns.h



On 9/23/2020 3:41 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] x86/asm: move the raw asm in iosubmit_cmds512() to special_insns.h
> 
> Start patch name with a capital letter: "Move the asm definition.."
> 
> Also, calling stuff "raw" and "core" is misleading in the kernel context
> - you wanna say simply: "Carve out a generic movdir64b() helper... "

Ok I will update

> 
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:15:16PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
>> index 59a3e13204c3..7bc8e714f37e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/special_insns.h
>> @@ -234,6 +234,23 @@ static inline void clwb(volatile void *__p)
>>   
>>   #define nop() asm volatile ("nop")
>>   
>> +static inline void movdir64b(void *__dst, const void *src)
> 
> Make __dst be the function local variable name and keep "dst", i.e.,
> without the underscores, the function parameter name.

Ok will fix

> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Note that this isn't an "on-stack copy", just definition of "dst"
>> +	 * as a pointer to 64-bytes of stuff that is going to be overwritten.
>> +	 * In the MOVDIR64B case that may be needed as you can use the
>> +	 * MOVDIR64B instruction to copy arbitrary memory around. This trick
>> +	 * lets the compiler know how much gets clobbered.
>> +	 */
>> +	volatile struct { char _[64]; } *dst = __dst;
>> +
>> +	/* MOVDIR64B [rdx], rax */
>> +	asm volatile(".byte 0x66, 0x0f, 0x38, 0xf8, 0x02"
>> +		     : "=m" (dst)
>> +		     : "d" (src), "a" (dst));
>> +}
>> +
>>   #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>>   
>>   #endif /* _ASM_X86_SPECIAL_INSNS_H */
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ