[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f429321-49c1-98b9-63e6-fd9c885af59c@marek.ca>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:10:04 -0400
From: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for
SM8250
On 9/22/20 3:00 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-11 08:34:07)
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..7c0f384a3a42
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8250.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1100 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2018-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
> [...]
>> +
>> +static const struct clk_parent_data disp_cc_parent_data_6[] = {
>> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo" },
>> + { .fw_name = "dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk" },
>> + { .fw_name = "dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk" },
>
> Can we remove clk postfix on these clk names?
>
This is consistent with the names used in both sdm845 and sc7180
drivers. If this should change then those should be changed too?
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk_src[] = {
>> + F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0),
>> + F(37500000, P_DISP_CC_PLL1_OUT_MAIN, 16, 0, 0),
>> + F(75000000, P_DISP_CC_PLL1_OUT_MAIN, 8, 0, 0),
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x22bc,
>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_3,
>> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk_src,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_3,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_3),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_shared_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src[] = {
>> + F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0),
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2110,
>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_2,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_2,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_2),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>
> Why do we need CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE? Please remove it.
>
>> + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x212c,
>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_2,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_2,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_2),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>> + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux1_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2240,
>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_1,
>> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux1_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_1,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_1),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x21dc,
>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_1,
>> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_aux_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_1,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_1),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_link1_clk_src[] = {
>> + F(162000000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> + F(270000000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> + F(540000000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> + F(810000000, P_DP_PHY_PLL_LINK_CLK, 1, 0, 0),
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_link1_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x220c,
>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0,
>> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_link1_clk_src,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_link1_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_0,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_0),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2178,
>> + .mnd_width = 0,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0,
>> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_dp_link1_clk_src,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_link_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_0,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_0),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_pixel1_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x21c4,
>> + .mnd_width = 16,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_pixel1_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_0,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_0),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>> + .ops = &clk_dp_ops,
>
> This is affected by the patch I just applied 355a7d754b92 ("clk: qcom:
> dispcc: Update DP clk ops for phy design"). Please resend.
>
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_dp_pixel2_clk_src = {
>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x21f4,
>> + .mnd_width = 16,
>> + .hid_width = 5,
>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0,
>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_dp_pixel2_clk_src",
>> + .parent_data = disp_cc_parent_data_0,
>> + .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_parent_data_0),
>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
>> + .ops = &clk_dp_ops,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists