lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB67635518BE38EEF5292C8D0991390@DB8PR04MB6763.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:20:33 +0000
From:   Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        "a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [Patch v2 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: pcf2127: Add bindings for
 nxp,pcf2127

On 21/09/2020 13:48:19+0800, Qiang Zhao wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> Sent: 2020年9月23日 17:45
> To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>; Guenter Roeck
> <linux@...ck-us.net>; linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org;
> a.zummo@...ertech.it; robh+dt@...nel.org; linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: pcf2127: Add bindings for
> nxp,pcf2127
> 
> Hi,
> 
> You forgot to copy the watchdog maintainers, I think such a property should be
> discussed with them.
> 
> Note that I'm still convinced this is not a complete solution, see:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kern
> el.org%2Flinux-rtc%2F20200716181816.GF3428%40piout.net%2F&amp;data=
> 02%7C01%7Cqiang.zhao%40nxp.com%7Cb71f79a044b0493d6d4f08d85fa551c
> b%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C637364510931174
> 355&amp;sdata=%2BOxrzB8RIuxM9Let5slhfCVmMm6PMNoERDeHC9%2Fdxng
> %3D&amp;reserved=0
> 

Yes, you are right, There is not a fundamental solution.
However it somewhat avoid this situation at least.

And if without this issue, 
is it correct to register a rtc device as watchdog no matter it is used as watchdog on the board? 
Every time Linux are booted up, watchdog device should be configured to the right one manually.
So the patch are useful, even though it is not for the issue.

What should we do to really resolve this issue?

Best Regards
Qiang Zhao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ