linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v38 23/24] docs: x86/sgx: Document SGX micro architecture and kernel internals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200924155459.GI5030@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:54:59 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        asapek@...gle.com, cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
        conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
        kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 23/24] docs: x86/sgx: Document SGX micro architecture
 and kernel internals

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:28:01PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:50:05PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > +This leaf function takes an RSA-3072 signature of the enclave measurement and an
> > > +optional cryptographic token. Linux does not take advantage of launch tokens.
> > > +The instruction checks that the signature is signed with the key defined in
> > > +**IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASH?** MSRs and the measurement is correct. If so, the
> > 
> > That '?' wants to be '[0123]' perhaps?
> 
> What do you think of this:
> 
> "The leaf instruction checks that the measurement is correct and
> signature is signed with the key hashed to the four
> +**IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASH{0, 1, 2, 3}** MSRs representing the SHA256 of a
> public key."

ACK.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette