linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Use printk_deferred() on raw_spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0dbf88bb7ca4d77ed0576ced82302b81aebe664.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:08:57 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Use printk_deferred() on raw_spin_lock()
 protected sections

On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 12:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:22:12PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> > While testing hotplug I got this BUG:
> > It was caused by printk() inside a code section protected by a
> > raw_spin_lock() that ended up calling a serial console that
> > uses a regular spin_lock().
> > 
> > Use the printk_deferred() to avoid calling the serial console
> > in a raw_spin_lock() protected section.
> 
> I consider printk_deferred() to be a bug, can't we just wait for the new
> printk implementation to land so we don't need all this nonsense?

It will be good to do a sed fixup for all these
printk_deferred uses soon,  but in the meantime
isn't it useful to avoid BUGs?