lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:22:47 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound/soc/codecs: fix spelling typo in comments On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 17:12 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:01:21AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 13:33 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > and compliment appears to be the one that > > > is used in the datasheet for this part... > > It's difficult to fix datasheet typos. > > Right, and if we search for the thing in the datasheet we should find > the thing in the datasheet so it's best to follow the datsheet even if > we don't think it's correct. That's one opinion. Another would be to use the correct word and if necessary add some comment showing that the datasheet writer didn't open a dictionary. complement (sic: compliment) I don't believe that's necessary, but opinions vary.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists