[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40ee756f-1f27-b17e-6292-d8069a56e3c8@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:37:33 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask in
sched domain
On 9/22/20 12:14 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> And a quick test with hackbench on my octo cores arm64 gives for 12
Vincent,
Is it octo (=10) or octa (=8) cores on a single socket for your system?
The L2 is per core or there are multiple L2s shared among groups of cores?
Wonder if placing the threads within a L2 or not within
an L2 could cause differences seen with Aubrey's test.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists