[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <129fceda-cf89-de74-f3fd-026c3c089d62@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:43:12 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Jiang Biao <benbjiang@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask in
sched domain
On 9/24/20 10:13 AM, Phil Auld wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:37:33AM -0700 Tim Chen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/22/20 12:14 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And a quick test with hackbench on my octo cores arm64 gives for 12
>>
>> Vincent,
>>
>> Is it octo (=10) or octa (=8) cores on a single socket for your system?
>
> In what Romance language does octo mean 10? :)
>
Got confused by october, the tenth month. :)
Tim
>
>> The L2 is per core or there are multiple L2s shared among groups of cores?
>>
>> Wonder if placing the threads within a L2 or not within
>> an L2 could cause differences seen with Aubrey's test.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists