linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] iommu/uapi: Introduce enum type for PASID data format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200924113107.75379e6e@jacob-builder>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:31:07 -0700
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Jacob Pan <jacob.pan.linux@...il.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
        Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@...el.com>, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] iommu/uapi: Introduce enum type for PASID data
 format

Hi Joerg,

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:40:16 +0200, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:

> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:44:50 +0200, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> > wrote: 
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 02:57:52PM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:  
> > > > There can be multiple vendor-specific PASID data formats used in
> > > > UAPI structures. This patch adds enum type with a last entry which
> > > > makes range checking much easier.    
> > > 
> > > But it also makes it much easier to screw up the numbers (which are
> > > ABI) by inserting a new value into the middle. I prefer defines here,
> > > or alternativly BUILD_BUG_ON() checks for the numbers.
> > >   
> > I am not following, the purpose of IOMMU_PASID_FORMAT_LAST *is* for
> > preparing the future insertion of new value into the middle.
> > The checking against IOMMU_PASID_FORMAT_LAST is to protect ABI
> > compatibility by making sure that out of range format are rejected in
> > all versions of the ABI.  
> 
> But with the enum you could have:
> 
> enum {
> 	VTD_FOO,
> 	SMMU_FOO,
> 	LAST,
> };
> 
> which makes VTD_FOO==0 and SMMU_FOO==1, and when in the next version
> someone adds:
> 
> enum {
> 	VTD_FOO,
> 	VTD_BAR,
> 	SMMU_FOO,
> 	LAST,
> };
> 
> then SMMU_FOO will become 2 and break ABI. So I'd like to have this
> checked somewhere.
Got your point, will change to defines.

Thanks,

Jacob