[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tuvn6i88.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:19:03 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
cocci <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] coccinelle: Convert comma to semicolons (was Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for comma use that should be semicolon)
On Sat, Aug 22 2020 at 09:07, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
>> True enough for a general statement, though the coccinelle
>> script Julia provided does not change a single instance of
>> for loop expressions with commas.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, no logic defect is introduced by the
>> script at all.
>
> The script has a rule to ensure that what is changed is part of a top
> level statement that has the form e1, e2;. I put that in to avoid
> transforming cases where the comma is the body of a macro, but it protects
> against for loop headers as well.
Right. I went through the lot and did not find something dodgy. Except
for two hunks this still applies. Can someone please send a proper patch
with changelog/SOB etc. for this?
And of course that script really wants to be part of the kernel cocci
checks to catch further instances.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists