linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] coccinelle: Convert comma to semicolons (was Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for comma use that should be semicolon)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d5383a3ec02d89dd05797c3ae158aebdc0c88ae.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:33:06 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        cocci <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] coccinelle: Convert comma to semicolons (was Re:
 [PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for comma use that should be semicolon)

On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 22:19 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22 2020 at 09:07, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > True enough for a general statement, though the coccinelle
> > > script Julia provided does not change a single instance of
> > > for loop expressions with commas.
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell, no logic defect is introduced by the
> > > script at all.
> > 
> > The script has a rule to ensure that what is changed is part of a top
> > level statement that has the form e1, e2;.  I put that in to avoid
> > transforming cases where the comma is the body of a macro, but it protects
> > against for loop headers as well.
> 
> Right. I went through the lot and did not find something dodgy. Except
> for two hunks this still applies. Can someone please send a proper patch
> with changelog/SOB etc. for this?

Treewide?

Somebody no doubt would complain, but there
_really should_ be some mechanism for these
trivial and correct treewide changes...