linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: Enable hardware before doing arch VM initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af0ccfeb-14eb-58c4-724b-bd75532cb6a4@de.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:30:20 +0200
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Enable hardware before doing arch VM initialization



On 23.09.20 20:57, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Swap the order of hardware_enable_all() and kvm_arch_init_vm() to
> accommodate Intel's Trust Domain Extension (TDX), which needs VMX to be
> fully enabled during VM init in order to make SEAMCALLs.
> 
> This also provides consistent ordering between kvm_create_vm() and
> kvm_destroy_vm() with respect to calling kvm_arch_destroy_vm() and
> hardware_disable_all().
> 
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
> Cc: Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>
> Cc: kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
> ---
> 
> Obviously not required until the TDX series comes along, but IMO KVM
> should be consistent with respect to enabling and disabling virt support
> in hardware.
> 
> Tested only on Intel hardware.  Unless I missed something, this only
> affects x86, Arm and MIPS as hardware enabling is a nop for s390 and PPC.

Yes, looks fine from an s390 perspective.

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>