linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] misc: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200924064838.GB593984@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:48:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@...n.io>,
        Dorian Stoll <dorian.stoll@...p.io>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/9] misc: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:34:23PM +0200, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> In short: Concurrent execution of the counter functions works, as far as
> I can tell at least, and, as you see by the long answer, I have to spend
> some time and think about the duplicate-value problem (again). If you've
> managed to read through this wall of text (sorry about that) and you
> have any ideas/preferences, please let me know.

No, this all answers my question really well, thanks, what you have now
is fine, no need to change it.

thanks,

greg k-h