lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d21e74e5-00a7-79f9-24d2-c9385409cc05@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:23:10 +0800
From:   Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, <eric.auger.pro@...il.com>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        <joro@...tes.org>, <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>, <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/11] vfio/pci: Add VFIO_REGION_TYPE_NESTED region
 type

Hi Eric,

On 2020/3/21 0:19, Eric Auger wrote:
> Add a new specific DMA_FAULT region aiming to exposed nested mode
> translation faults.
> 
> The region has a ring buffer that contains the actual fault
> records plus a header allowing to handle it (tail/head indices,
> max capacity, entry size). At the moment the region is dimensionned
> for 512 fault records.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> index 379a02c36e37..586b89debed5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,69 @@ int vfio_pci_set_power_state(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, pci_power_t state)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> +static void vfio_pci_dma_fault_release(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> +				       struct vfio_pci_region *region)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_pci_dma_fault_add_capability(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> +					     struct vfio_pci_region *region,
> +					     struct vfio_info_cap *caps)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_region_info_cap_fault cap = {
> +		.header.id = VFIO_REGION_INFO_CAP_DMA_FAULT,
> +		.header.version = 1,
> +		.version = 1,
> +	};
> +	return vfio_info_add_capability(caps, &cap.header, sizeof(cap));
> +}
> +
> +static const struct vfio_pci_regops vfio_pci_dma_fault_regops = {
> +	.rw		= vfio_pci_dma_fault_rw,
> +	.release	= vfio_pci_dma_fault_release,
> +	.add_capability = vfio_pci_dma_fault_add_capability,
> +};
> +
> +#define DMA_FAULT_RING_LENGTH 512
> +
> +static int vfio_pci_init_dma_fault_region(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_region_dma_fault *header;
> +	size_t size;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	mutex_init(&vdev->fault_queue_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We provision 1 page for the header and space for
> +	 * DMA_FAULT_RING_LENGTH fault records in the ring buffer.
> +	 */
> +	size = ALIGN(sizeof(struct iommu_fault) *
> +		     DMA_FAULT_RING_LENGTH, PAGE_SIZE) + PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> +	vdev->fault_pages = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vdev->fault_pages)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	ret = vfio_pci_register_dev_region(vdev,
> +		VFIO_REGION_TYPE_NESTED,
> +		VFIO_REGION_SUBTYPE_NESTED_DMA_FAULT,
> +		&vfio_pci_dma_fault_regops, size,
> +		VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ | VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE,
> +		vdev->fault_pages);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	header = (struct vfio_region_dma_fault *)vdev->fault_pages;
> +	header->entry_size = sizeof(struct iommu_fault);
> +	header->nb_entries = DMA_FAULT_RING_LENGTH;
> +	header->offset = sizeof(struct vfio_region_dma_fault);
> +	return 0;
> +out:
> +	kfree(vdev->fault_pages);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static int vfio_pci_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
>   {
>   	struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
> @@ -358,6 +421,10 @@ static int vfio_pci_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> +	ret = vfio_pci_init_dma_fault_region(vdev);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto disable_exit;
> +
>   	vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(vdev);
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -1383,6 +1450,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>   
>   	vfio_iommu_group_put(pdev->dev.iommu_group, &pdev->dev);
>   	kfree(vdev->region);
> +	kfree(vdev->fault_pages);
>   	mutex_destroy(&vdev->ioeventfds_lock);
>   
>   	if (!disable_idle_d3)
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> index 8a2c7607d513..a392f50e3a99 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_device {
>   	int			ioeventfds_nr;
>   	struct eventfd_ctx	*err_trigger;
>   	struct eventfd_ctx	*req_trigger;
> +	u8			*fault_pages;

What's the reason to use 'u8'? It doesn't match the type of header, nor
the type of ring buffer.

> +	struct mutex		fault_queue_lock;
>   	struct list_head	dummy_resources_list;
>   	struct mutex		ioeventfds_lock;
>   	struct list_head	ioeventfds_list;
> @@ -150,6 +152,14 @@ extern ssize_t vfio_pci_vga_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
>   extern long vfio_pci_ioeventfd(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, loff_t offset,
>   			       uint64_t data, int count, int fd);
>   
> +struct vfio_pci_fault_abi {
> +	u32 entry_size;
> +};

This is not used by this patch (and the whole series).

> +
> +extern size_t vfio_pci_dma_fault_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> +				    char __user *buf, size_t count,
> +				    loff_t *ppos, bool iswrite);
> +
>   extern int vfio_pci_init_perm_bits(void);
>   extern void vfio_pci_uninit_perm_bits(void);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> index a87992892a9f..4004ab8cad0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,51 @@ ssize_t vfio_pci_vga_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
>   	return done;
>   }
>   
> +size_t vfio_pci_dma_fault_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, char __user *buf,
> +			     size_t count, loff_t *ppos, bool iswrite)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i = VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(*ppos) - VFIO_PCI_NUM_REGIONS;
> +	loff_t pos = *ppos & VFIO_PCI_OFFSET_MASK;
> +	void *base = vdev->region[i].data;
> +	int ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (pos >= vdev->region[i].size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	count = min(count, (size_t)(vdev->region[i].size - pos));
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vdev->fault_queue_lock);
> +
> +	if (iswrite) {
> +		struct vfio_region_dma_fault *header =
> +			(struct vfio_region_dma_fault *)base;
> +		u32 new_tail;
> +
> +		if (pos != 0 || count != 4) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unlock;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (copy_from_user((void *)&new_tail, buf, count))
> +			goto unlock;
> +
> +		if (new_tail > header->nb_entries) {

Maybe

new_tail >= header->nb_entries ?

> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unlock;
> +		}
> +		header->tail = new_tail;
> +	} else {
> +		if (copy_to_user(buf, base + pos, count))
> +			goto unlock;
> +	}
> +	*ppos += count;
> +	ret = count;
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&vdev->fault_queue_lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
>   static int vfio_pci_ioeventfd_handler(void *opaque, void *unused)
>   {
>   	struct vfio_pci_ioeventfd *ioeventfd = opaque;


Thanks,
Zenghui

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ