lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:34:23 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     qianjun.kernel@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, will@...nel.org,
        luto@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     laoar.shao@...il.com, qais.yousef@....com, urezki@...il.com,
        jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/4] softirq: Use sched_clock() based timeout

On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at 19:56, qianjun kernel wrote:
> From: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
>
> Replace the jiffies based timeout with a sched_clock() based one.

Changelogs have to explain the WHY not the WHAT. What the patch is doing
is already in te subject line and the exact WHAT (implementation) is in
the patch itself.

This applies to all 4 patches in this series. Each wants to have an
explanation of why this makes sense and which problem this is trying to solve.

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ