linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/10] clocksource/drivers/sp804: Delete the leading "_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200924090534.2004630-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:05:29 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:     Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list:CLOCKSOURCE, CLOCKEVENT DRIVERS)
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] clocksource/drivers/sp804: Delete the leading "__" of some functions

From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>

Delete the leading "__" of __sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init() and
__sp804_clockevents_init(), make it looks a little more comfortable.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200918132237.3552-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
---
 drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c
index 97b41a493253..097f5a83163c 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-sp804.c
@@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ static u64 notrace sp804_read(void)
 	return ~readl_relaxed(sched_clock_base + TIMER_VALUE);
 }
 
-int  __init __sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(void __iomem *base,
-						     const char *name,
-						     struct clk *clk,
-						     int use_sched_clock)
+int __init sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(void __iomem *base,
+						  const char *name,
+						  struct clk *clk,
+						  int use_sched_clock)
 {
 	long rate;
 
@@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ static struct clock_event_device sp804_clockevent = {
 	.rating			= 300,
 };
 
-int __init __sp804_clockevents_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq, struct clk *clk, const char *name)
+int __init sp804_clockevents_init(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq,
+				  struct clk *clk, const char *name)
 {
 	struct clock_event_device *evt = &sp804_clockevent;
 	long rate;
@@ -228,21 +229,22 @@ static int __init sp804_of_init(struct device_node *np)
 	of_property_read_u32(np, "arm,sp804-has-irq", &irq_num);
 	if (irq_num == 2) {
 
-		ret = __sp804_clockevents_init(base + TIMER_2_BASE, irq, clk2, name);
+		ret = sp804_clockevents_init(base + TIMER_2_BASE, irq, clk2, name);
 		if (ret)
 			goto err;
 
-		ret = __sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(base, name, clk1, 1);
+		ret = sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(base,
+							     name, clk1, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			goto err;
 	} else {
 
-		ret = __sp804_clockevents_init(base, irq, clk1 , name);
+		ret = sp804_clockevents_init(base, irq, clk1, name);
 		if (ret)
 			goto err;
 
-		ret =__sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(base + TIMER_2_BASE,
-							      name, clk2, 1);
+		ret = sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(base + TIMER_2_BASE,
+							     name, clk2, 1);
 		if (ret)
 			goto err;
 	}
@@ -282,7 +284,8 @@ static int __init integrator_cp_of_init(struct device_node *np)
 		goto err;
 
 	if (!init_count) {
-		ret = __sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(base, name, clk, 0);
+		ret = sp804_clocksource_and_sched_clock_init(base,
+							     name, clk, 0);
 		if (ret)
 			goto err;
 	} else {
@@ -290,7 +293,7 @@ static int __init integrator_cp_of_init(struct device_node *np)
 		if (irq <= 0)
 			goto err;
 
-		ret = __sp804_clockevents_init(base, irq, clk, name);
+		ret = sp804_clockevents_init(base, irq, clk, name);
 		if (ret)
 			goto err;
 	}
-- 
2.25.1