[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200924095347.32148-1-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 10:53:45 +0100
From: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net, vireshk@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Cc: morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
nicola.mazzucato@....com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu performance dependencies
Hi Rob, Rafael, Viresh, Daniel and Sudeep,
I am proposing the addition of performance dependencies in cpufreq core
and one if its drivers (the implementation/approach is RFC).
This is to support systems where exposed cpu performance controls are more
fine-grained that the platform's ability to scale cpus independently.
In this V2 posting of the proposed dt-binding to support this, I have
included an outline of how this information can be stored and passed onto
relevant OSPM frameworks.
Please see each patch for detailed information.
[v2]
* Fix errors when running make dt_binding_check
* Improve commit message description for the dt-binding
* Add RFC for implementation in cpufreq-core and one of its
drivers.
Nicola Mazzucato (2):
dt-bindings: arm: Add devicetree binding for
cpu-performance-dependencies
[RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies
.../bindings/arm/cpu-perf-dependencies.yaml | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpu-perf-dependencies.yaml
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists