[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200924110706.254996-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:06:59 +0100
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, sumit.garg@...aro.org, maz@...nel.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/7] arm_pmu: Use NMI for perf interrupt
The series changes the arm_pmu driver to use NMIs for the perf interrupt
when NMIs are available on the platform (currently, only arm64 + GICv3). To
make it easier to play with the patches, I've pushed a branch at [1]:
$ git clone -b pmu-nmi-v7 git://linux-arm.org/linux-ae
The changes from v6 were minor, but I've still run the same tests on an
espressobin v7*. These are the results of running perf record -a -- sleep
60 (all results show kernel symbols with overhead >= 1%):
1. Without the patches:
11.14% [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq
9.09% [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
8.55% [k] arch_cpu_idle
2.60% [k] __softirqentry_text_start
1.13% [k] arch_counter_get_cntpct
1.13% [k] tick_nohz_idle_exit
1.09% [k] el0_svc_common.constprop.0
[..]
2. Using NMIs:
9.46% [k] arch_counter_get_cntpct
5.59% [k] wait_for_xmitr
3.78% [k] ktime_get
3.63% [k] __delay
1.54% [k] _raw_write_lock_irqsave
1.29% [k] arch_timer_evtstrm_available
1.24% [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.11% [k] refresh_cpu_vm_stats
1.06% [k] __schedule
1.03% [k] _find_next_bit.constprop.0
[..]
When running perf record -a -- iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1 -t 60:
1. Without the patches:
25.46% [k] __arch_copy_from_user
24.06% [k] __arch_copy_to_user
4.17% [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irq
2.52% [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
1.90% [k] __free_pages_ok
1.22% [k] get_page_from_freelist
1.21% [k] arch_cpu_idle
1.19% [k] tcp_ack
[..]
2. Using NMIs:
23.94% [k] __arch_copy_from_user
21.65% [k] __arch_copy_to_user
1.19% [k] tcp_ack
[..]
I've run the same tests in a VM when both host+guest use NMIs, and when
they don't. All of these tests were also ran on the model. Similar results
in all cases.
* All the firmware versions for espressobin v7 that I've tried clear
SCR_EL3.FIQ, which means that NMIs don't work with the upstream kernel. To
test the series, I've applied the patches from irq/irqchip-next to enable
pseudo-NMIs when SCR_EL3.FIQ == 0. I've also pushed a branch [2] with the
patches applied on top of this series:
$ git clone -b pmu-nmi-v7-nmi-fiq-clear-v3 git://linux-arm.org/linux-ae
Summary of the patches:
* Patch 1 is a fix for a bug that Julien found during the review for v4.
* Patches 2 and 3 remove locking from arm64 perf event code.
* Patches 4 and 5 makes the arm64 PMU interrupt handler NMI safe.
* Patches 6 and 7 enable the use of NMIs on arm64 with a GICv3 irqchip.
Changes since v6 [3]:
- Rebased on top of v5.9-rc6
- Moved the ISBs to armv8pmu_{enable, disable}_counter()
- Added irq_work_sync() to kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy()
- Reworked armpmu_find_irq_ops() as per Will's suggestion
- Print message when NMIs are used by the PMU
- The changes were minor, so I've added the Tested-by tag for v6 from Sumit
Garg. Many thanks for the testing!
Changes since v5 [4]:
- Rebased on top of v5.9-rc1.
- Typo fixes.
- Added comments to the ISB added by patches #1 and #2.
- Reworded message for patch #4, as per Mark's excellent suggestion.
Changes since v4 [5]:
- Rebased on top of v5.8-rc1 and dropped the Tested-by tags because it's
been almost a year since the series has been tested.
- Dropped patch 3 because I couldn't find any instance where
armv7pmu_read_counter() was called with interrupts enabled. I've also
tested this by running several instances of perf for a few hours, and the
function was called every time with interrupts disabled.
- Dropped patches 4 and 5 because the tradeoff wasn't worth it in my
opinion: the irq handler was slower all the time (because it
saved/restored the counter select register), in exchange for being
slightly faster on the rare ocassions when it triggered at the beginning
of the critical sections.
- Minor changes here and there to address review comments.
Changes since v3 [6]:
- Added tags
- Fix build issue for perf_event_v6
- Don't disable preemption in pmu->enable()
- Always rely on IPI_IRQ_WORK to run the queued work
- Fixed typos + cleanups
Changes since v2 [7]:
- Rebased on recent linux-next (next-20190708)
- Fixed a number of bugs with indices (reported by Wei)
- Minor style fixes
Changes since v1 [8]:
- Rebased on v5.1-rc1
- Pseudo-NMI has changed a lot since then, use the (now merged) NMI API
- Remove locking from armv7 perf_event
- Use locking only in armv6 perf_event
- Use direct counter/type registers insted of selector register for armv8
[1] http://www.linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-ae.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pmu-nmi-v7
[2] http://www.linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-ae.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pmu-nmi-v7-nmi-fiq-clear-v3
[3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/19/671
[4] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3554236.html
[5] https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-July/666824.html
[6] https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-July/665339.html
[7] https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-March/640536.html
[8] https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2018-January/554611.html
Alexandru Elisei (1):
arm64: perf: Add missing ISB in armv8pmu_enable_counter()
Julien Thierry (5):
arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking
arm64: perf: Defer irq_work to IPI_IRQ_WORK
KVM: arm64: pmu: Make overflow handler NMI safe
arm_pmu: Introduce pmu_irq_ops
arm_pmu: arm64: Use NMIs for PMU
Mark Rutland (1):
arm64: perf: Avoid PMXEV* indirection
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 26 +++++-
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 255 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists