lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=U_dshqBB8HBhGyYnn_vScTOcLJX=mfU+8Wi5wjZL2oYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 13:51:07 +0200
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:     Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] kasan: add workqueue and timer stack for generic KASAN

> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst |  5 +++--
> kernel/time/timer.c               |  3 +++
> kernel/workqueue.c                |  3 +++
> lib/test_kasan_module.c           | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/kasan/report.c                 |  4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

While at it, can you remove a mention of call_rcu() from the
kasan_record_aux_stack() implementation, as it is no more
RCU-specific?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ