lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200924123527.GJ2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:35:27 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vincent.donnefort@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] sched: Add migrate_disable()

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:53:25PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > @@ -1830,8 +1892,19 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data
> >   */
> >  void set_cpus_allowed_common(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask, u32 flags)
> >  {
> > -	cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_mask, new_mask);
> > -	p->nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(new_mask);
> > +	if (flags & SCA_MIGRATE_DISABLE) {
> > +		p->cpus_ptr = new_mask;
> > +		p->nr_cpus_allowed = 1;
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (flags & SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE)
> > +		p->cpus_ptr = &p->cpus_mask;
> 
> There's that check in __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() that new_mask *must* be
> p->cpus_mask when SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE; that means we could mayhaps shuffle
> that to:
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7cb13df48366..e0e4e42c5e32 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1892,18 +1892,14 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
>   */
>  void set_cpus_allowed_common(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask, u32 flags)
>  {
> +	if (flags & (SCA_MIGRATE_DISABLE | SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE))
>                 p->cpus_ptr = new_mask;
>         else
>                 cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_mask, new_mask);
> 
> +	if (flags & SCA_MIGRATE_DISABLE)
> +		p->nr_cpus_allowed = 1;
> +	else if (p->cpus_ptr == &p->cpus_mask)
>                 p->nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(p->cpus_ptr);
>  }

I'm thinking we should let nr_cpus_allowed reflect ->cpus_mask
unconditionally. See these emails:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200923170809.GY1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
  https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200924082717.GA1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

Basically we want to keep migrate_disable() tasks elegible for
migration/PULL.

But yes, I think that function can be simplified.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ