linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 seccomp 4/6] seccomp/cache: Lookup syscall allowlist for fast path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <64052a5b81d5dacd63efb577c1d99e6f98e69702.1600951211.git.yifeifz2@illinois.edu>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:44:19 -0500
From:   YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@...il.com>
To:     containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Dimitrios Skarlatos <dskarlat@...cmu.edu>,
        Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
        Hubertus Franke <frankeh@...ibm.com>,
        Jack Chen <jianyan2@...inois.edu>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Josep Torrellas <torrella@...inois.edu>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Tianyin Xu <tyxu@...inois.edu>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        Valentin Rothberg <vrothber@...hat.com>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 seccomp 4/6] seccomp/cache: Lookup syscall allowlist for fast path

From: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>

The fast (common) path for seccomp should be that the filter permits
the syscall to pass through, and failing seccomp is expected to be
an exceptional case; it is not expected for userspace to call a
denylisted syscall over and over.

This first finds the current allow bitmask by iterating through
syscall_arches[] array and comparing it to the one in struct
seccomp_data; this loop is expected to be unrolled. It then
does a test_bit against the bitmask. If the bit is set, then
there is no need to run the full filter; it returns
SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW immediately.

Co-developed-by: Dimitrios Skarlatos <dskarlat@...cmu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dimitrios Skarlatos <dskarlat@...cmu.edu>
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@...inois.edu>
---
 kernel/seccomp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 20d33378a092..ac0266b6d18a 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -167,6 +167,12 @@ static inline void seccomp_cache_inherit(struct seccomp_filter *sfilter,
 					 const struct seccomp_filter *prev)
 {
 }
+
+static inline bool seccomp_cache_check(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilter,
+				       const struct seccomp_data *sd)
+{
+	return false;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_NR_ONLY */
 
 /**
@@ -321,6 +327,34 @@ static int seccomp_check_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_NR_ONLY
+/**
+ * seccomp_cache_check - lookup seccomp cache
+ * @sfilter: The seccomp filter
+ * @sd: The seccomp data to lookup the cache with
+ *
+ * Returns true if the seccomp_data is cached and allowed.
+ */
+static bool seccomp_cache_check(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilter,
+				const struct seccomp_data *sd)
+{
+	int syscall_nr = sd->nr;
+	int arch;
+
+	if (unlikely(syscall_nr < 0 || syscall_nr >= NR_syscalls))
+		return false;
+
+	for (arch = 0; arch < ARRAY_SIZE(syscall_arches); arch++) {
+		if (likely(syscall_arches[arch] == sd->arch))
+			return test_bit(syscall_nr,
+					sfilter->cache.syscall_ok[arch]);
+	}
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
+	return false;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_NR_ONLY */
+
 /**
  * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
  * @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
@@ -343,6 +377,9 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
 	if (WARN_ON(f == NULL))
 		return SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS;
 
+	if (seccomp_cache_check(f, sd))
+		return SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW;
+
 	/*
 	 * All filters in the list are evaluated and the lowest BPF return
 	 * value always takes priority (ignoring the DATA).
-- 
2.28.0