linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: fix indentation mistakes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqFrpMotaiLwj=Q1cUqVc1S-Oeqhq3kt6QqyW=A0T1Y9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:49:51 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: fix indentation mistakes

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 17:38, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Fix inconsistent indenting, reported by Smatch:
>
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c:1380 sdhci_esdhc_imx_hwinit() warn: inconsistent indenting
>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c:390 sdhci_sprd_request_done() warn: inconsistent indenting
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>

Applied for next, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe


> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c      | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 62b3d4767916..fce8fa7e6b30 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -1377,7 +1377,7 @@ static void sdhci_esdhc_imx_hwinit(struct sdhci_host *host)
>                          * response, block the tuning procedure or the first command
>                          * after the whole tuning procedure always can't get any response.
>                          */
> -                        tmp |= ESDHC_TUNING_CMD_CRC_CHECK_DISABLE;
> +                       tmp |= ESDHC_TUNING_CMD_CRC_CHECK_DISABLE;
>                         writel(tmp, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
>                 } else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MAN_TUNING) {
>                         /*
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c
> index 1efaf602c206..58109c5b53e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void sdhci_sprd_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host,
>         if (mmc_hsq_finalize_request(host->mmc, mrq))
>                 return;
>
> -        mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
> +       mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
>  }
>
>  static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_sprd_ops = {
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void sdhci_sprd_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  }
>
>  static int sdhci_sprd_request_atomic(struct mmc_host *mmc,
> -                                     struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +                                    struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  {
>         sdhci_sprd_check_auto_cmd23(mmc, mrq);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>