lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:28:25 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>,
        PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Move allocate and map page for msi out of dw_pcie_msi_init()

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:00 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 08:28, Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, dw_pcie_msi_init() allocates and maps page for msi, then
> > program the PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO and PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI. The Root Complex
> > may lose power during suspend-to-RAM, so when we resume, we want to
> > redo the latter but not the former. If designware based driver (for
> > example, pcie-tegra194.c) calls dw_pcie_msi_init() in resume path, the
> > previous msi page will be leaked.
> >
> > Move the allocate and map msi page from dw_pcie_msi_init() to
> > dw_pcie_host_init() to fix this problem.
> >
> > Fixes: 56e15a238d92 ("PCI: tegra: Add Tegra194 PCIe support")
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
>
> Why do you allocate a page for this in the first place? Isn't
> PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI:PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO simply a magic DMA address that
> never gets forwarded across to the CPU side of the host bridge, and
> triggers a SPI instead, which gets handled by reading
> PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS ?

My question too after digging into this some more. I've asked the
question on the thread that further complicated all this changing from
virt_to_phys() to dma_map_page()[1].

> Couldn't you just map the zero page instead?

Why a page even? You could use PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO address itself even.
Or just an address in the driver data which is what some other drivers
do.

Rob

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20200923231846.GA1499246@bogus/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ