linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 2/2] Add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200924132334.GT3956970@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:23:34 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Rahul Tanwar <rahul.tanwar@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, songjun.Wu@...el.com,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
        rahul.tanwar.linux@...il.com, rtanwar@...linear.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 2/2] Add PWM fan controller driver for LGM SoC

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:55:34AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:23:37PM +0800, Rahul Tanwar wrote:

...

> > +	ret = lgm_clk_enable(dev, pc);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> 
> You used dev_err_probe four times for six error paths. I wonder why you
> didn't use it here (and below for a failing pwmchip_add()).

dev_err_probe() makes sense when we might experience deferred probe. In neither
of mentioned function this can be the case.

> > +		return ret;
> > +	}

...

> > +	ret = lgm_reset_control_deassert(dev, pc);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "cannot deassert reset control\n");
> 
> After lgm_reset_control_deassert is called pc->rst is unused. So there
> is no need to have this member in struct lgm_pwm_chip. The same applies
> to ->clk. (You have to pass rst (or clk) to devm_add_action_or_reset for
> that to work. Looks like a nice idea anyhow.)

True. And above dev_err_probe() is not needed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko