linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] rseq/membarrier: add MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:00:23 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:     Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>, paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Chris Kennelly <ckennelly@...gle.com>,
        Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
        linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] rseq/membarrier: add
 MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_RSEQ

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:51:43AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- On Sep 23, 2020, at 7:36 PM, Peter Oskolkov posk@...gle.com wrote:
> 
> > This patchset is based on Google-internal RSEQ
> > work done by Paul Turner and Andrew Hunter.
> > 
> > When working with per-CPU RSEQ-based memory allocations,
> > it is sometimes important to make sure that a global
> > memory location is no longer accessed from RSEQ critical
> > sections. For example, there can be two per-CPU lists,
> > one is "active" and accessed per-CPU, while another one
> > is inactive and worked on asynchronously "off CPU" (e.g.
> > garbage collection is performed). Then at some point
> > the two lists are swapped, and a fast RCU-like mechanism
> > is required to make sure that the previously active
> > list is no longer accessed.
> > 
> > This patch introduces such a mechanism: in short,
> > membarrier() syscall issues an IPI to a CPU, restarting
> > a potentially active RSEQ critical section on the CPU.
> > 
> 
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>

Thanks!, I've queued them in:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/core

please double check the Subject/Changelog edits I made. Once all the
robots are green, I'll push out the lot to -tip.