[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200924143922.GA22539@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:39:24 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Stash 'kvm' in a local variable in
kvm_mmu_free_roots()
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:42:19PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> What about kvm_mmu_get_page(), make_mmu_pages_available(),
> mmu_alloc_root(), kvm_mmu_sync_roots(), direct_page_fault(),
> kvm_mmu_pte_write() which seem to be using the same ugly pattern? :-)
Heh, good question. I guess only kvm_mmu_free_roots() managed to cross over
the threshold from "that's ugly" to "this is ridiculous".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists