[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7c54f39-976c-644b-a451-83d8d508f0bb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 23:30:50 +0530
From: Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] Fix uninit-value in
hci_chan_lookup_handle
On 05/09/20 7:34 am, Anant Thazhemadam wrote:
> When the amount of data stored in the location corresponding to
> iov_iter *from is less then 4, some data seems to go uninitialized.
>
> Updating this condition accordingly, makes sense both intuitively and
> logically as well, since the other check for extreme condition done is if
> len > HCI_MAX_FRAME_SIZE, which is HCI_MAX_ACL_SIZE (which is 1024) + 4;
> which itself gives some idea about what must be the ideal mininum size.
>
> Reported-and-tested by: syzbot+4c14a8f574461e1c3659@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam <anant.thazhemadam@...il.com>
> ---
> If there is some explicit reason why len < 4 doesn't work, and only len < 2 works,
> please do let me know.
> The commit message that introduced the initial change
> (512b2268156a4e15ebf897f9a883bdee153a54b7) wasn't exactly very helpful in this
> respect, and I couldn't find a whole lot of discussion regarding this either.
>
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c
> index 8ab26dec5f6e..0c49821d7b98 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static inline ssize_t vhci_get_user(struct vhci_data *data,
> __u8 pkt_type, opcode;
> int ret;
>
> - if (len < 2 || len > HCI_MAX_FRAME_SIZE)
> + if (len < 4 || len > HCI_MAX_FRAME_SIZE)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> skb = bt_skb_alloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
Hi,
Looks like this patch might have missed the attention of those
who can tell me if this works or why it might not.
For some more context; more details about the bug can be found at
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=287b84cc1c834c7878c4193d7b18760067f10a77
I should've highlighted that in my initial mail. My apologies.
Thanks,
Anant
Powered by blists - more mailing lists