linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] PCI/RCEC: Bind RCEC devices to the Root Port driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200925195913.GA2455203@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:59:13 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Sean V Kelley <seanvk.dev@...gontracks.org>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...el.com,
        qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] PCI/RCEC: Bind RCEC devices to the Root Port
 driver

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:38:51PM -0700, Sean V Kelley wrote:
> From: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
> 
> If a Root Complex Integrated Endpoint (RCiEP) is implemented, errors may
> optionally be sent to a corresponding Root Complex Event Collector (RCEC).
> Each RCiEP must be associated with no more than one RCEC. Interface errors
> are reported to the OS by RCECs.
> 
> For an RCEC (technically not a Bridge), error messages "received" from
> associated RCiEPs must be enabled for "transmission" in order to cause a
> System Error via the Root Control register or (when the Advanced Error
> Reporting Capability is present) reporting via the Root Error Command
> register and logging in the Root Error Status register and Error Source
> Identification register.
> 
> Given the commonality with Root Ports and the need to also support AER
> and PME services for RCECs, extend the Root Port driver to support RCEC
> devices through the addition of the RCEC Class ID to the driver
> structure.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean V Kelley <sean.v.kelley@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 8 ++++----
>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c  | 5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> index 50a9522ab07d..99769c636775 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
> @@ -234,11 +234,11 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  #endif
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Root ports are capable of generating PME too.  Root Complex
> -	 * Event Collectors can also generate PMEs, but we don't handle
> -	 * those yet.
> +	 * Root ports and Root Complex Event Collectors are capable
> +	 * of generating PME.
>  	 */
> -	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> +	if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> +	     pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC) &&

It seems like this change belongs in patch 09/10, where we change
pme.c so it claims both Root Ports and RCECs.  Does this hunk
accomplish anything before 09/10?

>  	    (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme)) {
>  		services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> index 3a3ce40ae1ab..4d880679b9b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ static int pcie_portdrv_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  	if (!pci_is_pcie(dev) ||
>  	    ((pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT) &&
>  	     (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) &&
> -	     (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)))
> +	     (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) &&
> +	     (pci_pcie_type(dev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC)))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	status = pcie_port_device_register(dev);
> @@ -195,6 +196,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id port_pci_ids[] = {
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(((PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 8) | 0x00), ~0) },
>  	/* subtractive decode PCI-to-PCI bridge, class type is 060401h */
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(((PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 8) | 0x01), ~0) },
> +	/* handle any Root Complex Event Collector */
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(((PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_RCEC << 8) | 0x00), ~0) },
>  	{ },
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.28.0
>