lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:48:04 -0400
From:   Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] tools/x86: add kcpuid tool to show raw CPU
 features

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:16:31PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:45:29AM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> > > Rather than a tool, would additional file(s) in, say,
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu<n> be nicer? They could show the raw CPUID
> > > features, one file per leaf or sub-leaf, maybe even along with whether
> > > they were disabled at boot-time.
> > 
> > My thought is we already have in-kernel powerful /proc/cpuinfo, while 
> > a user space tool could be more flexible for text parsing/layout, and
> > show different info on user's demand/options.
> 
> The important thing here is that a separate tool would be decoupled from
> the kernel and thus will be independent from it, i.e., you can get the
> tool and run it without having to install a new kernel.
> 
> And with the CPUID leafs specified in a text file, you won't even need
> to update the tool even - just cpuid.txt. It can't get any better than
> that.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Ok. Another suggestion: while designing the format for the cpuid.txt
file, would it be possible to include enough information for
cpufeatures.h to be auto-generated from it?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ